Wednesday, March 07, 2007

What’s Wrong with Complete Silence? A Rant Pondering the Importance of Colonial Williamsburg and the Wicked Son of David Mamet



For all these thought, I blame, I mean thank, my girlfriend Kate and her words, "I'm going to Colonial Williamsburg this weekend." After the happy thought of "without me" immediately rushed through my mind, my secondary brainwaves were working on a different string of musings, not that I have a problem with going to historical-type places. This occurred as I talked on the phone with her while The Colbert Report was on in the background, snacking ona rotation of ranch Wheat Thins and ranch sunflower seeds, and checking out the Rotten Tomatoes rating of Wild Hogs (19% positive if you are wondering, an +11% approval rating over The Number 23 ). Another fucking tangent Joe, STOP IT. Back to the important realization at hand please and it is not your psychosis.

It's really unsettling when you finally ponder the sad fact of it. I'm sure you've heard it a thousand times in about fifty different ways but this is a generation of constant stimulation: visual, auditory or even olfactory. Pink Floyd dealt with it at length in song. They anthropomorphized it into "the machine." And even if Roger Waters, David Gilmour, and company didn't have a secret way to seeing into the future (in their minds or in Reality), they saw it coming. We all saw it coming.

As I sit here at Barnes & Noble, a place where my mind has convinced me is a restful spot for my mind, I bombard myself with activity. I knew I was this person but I never thought I was this bad. I am sipping on a hot Cinnamon Tea, jotting notes on a notepad, while browsing my blog reader, and contemplating making a phone call while smoking a cigarette but I think my cell phone is in my car so I'll have to press the button on my keychain unlock the door, reach around, find the phone and then forget who I wanted to call in the first place. Why did I come here again? Oh, I'm suposed to be finishing a book by a Pulitzer prize winning essayist, playwright, and filmmaker David Mamet about the modern self-loathing Jew called The Wicked Son.

So Colonial Williamsburg, yes. It would be nice and quaint to revert back to a time when you could take a walk and not worry about the battery charge left in your IPod or how much time you had for your walk before you had to rush and drive somewhere else because we're all very busy, besides the fact that you drove to the park to take that walk which seems to defeat the purpose of taking the walk to begin with. It would be tortuous to enter this olde world after you mind has been overtaken and inundated with our communication and information obsession. Imagine your inability call anyone at anytime, check the scores of the game by flipping open a little metal/plastic object in your pocket. You had to make your own music with rocks and sticks. Images can't flicker in front of your eyes like they constantly do today. If you were lucky, you could see one drawing in a book. The rest was left to your imagination.

Imagination. I don't think I know anyone who has a really sharp one anymore. I used to think I had one but it's been dulled in my old age (24 as of 2 weeks ago). I've been trying and trying to get it going but that has also stunted it. My mind is frozen because it can't pay attention long enough to one endeavor in order to complete it in full. I want to do everything all at the same time. It can be seen by the diversionary tactics taken at Barnes and Noble. Even with a planned task at hand, I enter the Barnes & Noble with about 3 hours remaining till the close and pick up PC Magazine, Computer Arts Projects Magazine, Paste Music Magazine, and Filmmaker Magazine to name a few. Does one have too many interests in order to make himself feel special?



David Mamet quoted another writer named Eric Hoffer in one of the intro quotes that he had before each chapter, "One who hates what most people love probably savors his own uniqueness." While this isn't a completely perfect segue-way, is this what I like everybody is doing. We customize everything and upgrade to the new version when the old version works fine. My old car was dying but it still worked still I blew my savings on leasing a new Mazda. A Why did a paper and pen give way to a multitasking productivity suite? What do I really need a new laptop for? How many computers and hard drives does a person need? The cure might be reversion.We need to be brainwashed into the focused nature of our time in the crib. Wake up, cry, eat, nap, eat, fill the diaper, get changed, look around and wonder, laugh cry, milk, nap, stare at the dumb mobile, more food, try to escape the crib, fall, cry, nap again. It seems a bit simpler.re we all just faking it? Or am I just being a downer?

Here's what I've come up with an immediate quick answer. I plan to make a concerted effort to focus on one thing at a time or tried to section off the tasks. Some objectives aren't meant as part of a multitasking lifestyle. If I'm trying to work on a script, then I'm working on a script. If writing a story or a "song," then that's what I'm doing. Will it be more effective? Will the outcomes be more fruitful and gratifying then recent efforts? Hopefully, for my own psyche. It's not writer's block if you're writing but it's writer's glut if its all ready to be burnt when it's finished. You can waste time on the non-salvageable if it will lead to a greater good. Maybe I should reject my apostate status that Mamet speaks so much of his book, although I'm not self-loathing of my heritage and religion, just lax in practice but still acknowledging its existence and its part in the definition of how I try to live my life.

Am I complicit in causing my own spiritual, creative, and contentment abyss? I'll worry about the religion part over time but for now I will stab at overcoming the creative and contentment part which is mostly a mental roadblock. I will turn off my phone. I will finish the book, although it's due at the library tomorrow and I've already renewed it three times. Maybe I'll just start another book. I will not be going to Colonial Williamsburg but I'm not in the class that the girlfriend is taking that is leading her there. I am not in any classes. I will try harder to focus and finish the task at hand. True multitasking is for special occasions. Bad for everyday use unless its on boring menial tasks at work like typing e-mails while listening to the slow drawl of a woman from Alabama complaining about the malfunctioning of her farting dog doll. But I still won't turn off my IPod, even if it's the one of the roots of this dysfunction. You can't change overnight, unless you accept Jesus as your personal savior.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Quick Review: Zodiac

Zodiac had everything going for it; A great cast, an amazing director (minus the useless Panic Room, Jodie Foster really sucks of late), and it matched all that with an interesting story of murder, obsession, and kookiness.

Zodiac is a breath of relief. A quality, interesting film released during the year and not just waiting for Oscar time. The movie has a few main characters that seem to take over adn then return the mantle to the other. Mark Ruffalo and Jake Gyllenhaal have the main plotlines but RObert Downey Jr. steals the show as a what else, but a zany beat reporter with affinities for the drink, the tobacco, and the nose candy. He is the go to guy for that. And if yo missed Kiss Kiss Bang BAng, I'd reccommend a run to the rental store ASAP.

At every turn there is just another excellent actor or character. Brian Cox shows up. From Fargo, the guy who played Norm, Marge's husband re-emerges with a strong performance. Minkus from "Boy Meets World" even shows up. The guy who played Gus in Don't Tell Mom The Babysitter's Dead is even in there. As well as Chloe Sevigny, Anthony Edwards (from ER), Elias Koteas, and even Dermot Mulroney has a decent showing. These names might not mean much to many but it was cool to see this kind of cast assembled.

Positive reviews and a very good overall movie. The only impediment for most is the length of the movie. It's 2 1/2 plus hours which is a lot for a film like this, and while it does drag at points, it's refreching the way the film unravels and is not cut short to fit the regular two hour popcorn session. So after all this, the movie will probably get crushed this weekend by Wild Hogs. And that is what is wrong with America.

Who is actually seeing Wild Hogs? Who thought this movie was a good idea? Why do people keep going and paying for movies with John Travolta? They should make another Saturday Night Fever like Rocky 6? This review didn't end up as short as I planned it.

Is 24 just turning it on? (Spoilers)


Here’s my humble opinion to preface the future episodes of 24, beginning with tonight:

After the first 6 or so episodes of 24, I was becoming scared for the future. **SPOILERS if you haven’t been watching this current season**

These episodes had an abundance of story lines that competing for precious airtime and useless, boring, time filler story lines. The President's sister watches her Arab boyfriend try to infiltrate his fellow Arab Detainees through surveillance cameras with the FBI. That was just boring diversionary crap. The British guy trying to find a new guy to set up the bomb’s triggers for Fayed was pretty boring but it did end up being important.

Chloe's love angle is too emotional for her character and is distracting. The increased involvement of Morris, Chloe’s alcoholic, ex-husband is a good character on his own and doesn't need all this Chloe Stuff. And there was Kumar and how a nice family was wrong and he was actual a terrorist. Who besides me had forgotten Kumar was on this season until right now?

And seriously, how many more Bauer family members do they have to drudge up for emotional family crap? The only Bauer holding his weight in the show is James Cromwell as his triple-crossing cold hearted father. Now a light is at the end of the tunnel, there is a major ass-kicking, chases and torturing on their way and they are all gonna be by Jack Bauer. Can we lose this Sister in Law, previous love affair crap? PLEASE. JACK DOES NOT ALWAYS NEED A FUCKING BITCHY WOMAN TO TIE HIM DOWN. If you think about it, Jack Bauer would never have the Women weakness, he is a trained warrior who just lusts to save the world, not worry about whiny blondes like Audrey, his daughter, and this new kid who looked like he walked off a beach runway in The OC.

It was all too much; too many boring characters, too many running plotlines but after last week, there seems to be a light at the end of the tunnel.

There was much talk with 24 fans of the show “jumping the shark.” But the 2nd half of the season is prepping to re-ascend 24 to the apex of television drama. Jack Bauer has figured out the family dirt and is ready to starting foil multiple apocalyptic plots in a matter of hours while having to fight urges of the necessary evil that is coming from inside his family. And now there has been an attempt on the Presiden’t life. How come we never get a shot at our President?

Anyway, Here’s my list of possible, positive developments:

1. Chad Lowe has been a fucking acting-sibling-revelation with his excellent portrayal of the creepy and conniving Deputy Chief of Staff.

2. Lowe has tied up the Chief of Staff, that guy from whiny Ally McBeal and taped his mouth shut so he can't keep bitching and whining to the president.

3. Jack hasn't been able to stop everything as usual; the vulnerability gives the show a bit of fresh air.

4. The chase for Jack's father should be gut-wrenching and awesome. Cromwell is the 2nd best person that could have been cast as Jack's father, after Keifer's creepy own real father and excellent actor Donald Sutherland. (That might be a bit weird though.) UNNECESSARY CONNECTION NOTE OF THE DAY: Remember Cromwell's excellent portrayal as the crooked and devious Capt. Dudley Smith.

5. Fayed has been pretty inactive for a few episodes, and now that I'm not tired of seeing his face, I kind of miss his devilish attitude. He fucking stabbed Morris in the back with a drill.

6. The collusion with the Russians and the Arabs is very interesting. Ruskie's play great enemy characters, maybe that's embedded in my mind from all that Cold War brainwashing in 60s-80s American film. Gredenko is the cold hearted prototype of a maniacal Russian. He's ruthless, war-starved, and ready for action. Back handed and evil. Gredenko is played by a man named Rade Serbedzija. Serbedzija played one of my favorite villains in The Saint with Val Kilmer. Interestingly, he plays a lot of Russians but he is from Serb born in Croatia and has been a busy man with 13 credits in 2006-2007.

7. Good backstabbing is the key to 24' s success and the most important of the recent backstabber has been reintroduced in this episode. Ex-President Charles Logan, who was responsible for the assassination of President Palmer. Logan claims to have seen Jesus or whatever and wants redemption. (Have you noticed Logan kind of looks like Nixon?)

8. The one thing the writers have done is end some of these episodes on excellent high notes. Giving the audience a taste but making you come back for the results. Think of the mushroom cloud explosion, Curtis’ death and now the attempted assassination of the new President Palmer and Assad. (Did anyone else notice that Assad is the Doctor from Star Trek Deep Space : Nine and now he’s the Hollywood’s go to go guy for diplomatic Arab characters (see also: Syriana) It will be sad to see Assad go, he’d been under-utilized of late, and was a very strong and interesting character. The President too was starting to grow on me in these last two episodes, but there’s no way he’s really dead.

So 24 may be on its way back and I’m looking forward to the next 3 months of action to decide. Remember, you can never give up on Jack Bauer…

TV Squad reviews last week’s 24

What do you think?

Thursday, March 01, 2007

New Harry Potter Book Title: Harry Potter and The Post Equine Coital Cigarette



You Might have heard that the Harry Potter kid (Daniel Radcliffe) is making his West End (London's Broadway) stage debut in the nude.

But did you know that in this play Equus he's smoking and fucking horses.



The BBC says it in a nicer way:
"(Daniel) "Radcliffe plays troubled stableboy Alan Strang, who has an erotic relationship with his horses."

Alan Strang is a pretty good porn name. Well, Mr. Radcliffe, now you are a really shown your range. You're a real actor now.

On a serious note: Radcliffe was actually very funny in a self-effacing guest starring role on Ricky Gervais' quickly improving Extras.(creator and star of the UK version of The Office). He acts like a sex craved and spoiled teeny bopper star who makes a pass at any woman in sight while carrying around an unrolled condom in his hand. Give it a look if you have HBO on Demand.

Potter star's stage debut praised (BBC)